Skip to content Skip to footer

Triage Or Die

I've been thinking about the concept of "triage" a lot lately. I understand that being a borderline hypochondriac doesn't exactly qualify me to talk about triage as a medical concept, but I think as a more general idea, the concept of triage has a lot to offer. Allow me to explain... Wikipedia, the most reliable source of information in the world, defines "triage" as:
A process of prioritizing patients based on the severity of their condition so as to treat as many as possible when resources are insufficient for all to be treated immediately. The term comes from the French verb trier, meaning 'to sort, sift or select.'
Doctors use this concept to sort through their "work", so to speak, to accurately prioritize what should be happening now, and what should not. This strikes me as a key life concept. What if we were to broaden the idea of triage into a more general frame? I am becoming more and more convinced that, to be truly effective human beings, we must constantly be in a state of awareness, in a position to persistently perform triage on our own lives, to prioritize and systematically assess what we're doing with the time we have. We all get the same amount of time every day (roughly 24 hours, last I checked), but for some reason, some folks we meet are highly successful -- however we choose to define the term -- and some are not. Why? People that aren't cutting it suck at triage. For some reason (or many reasons) these people can't sort through the myriad details of their lives to be able to separate events and prioritize things. They are either frighteningly lost in the complexity of life or they choose to ignore the fact that they have some control over their impending future. Part of this I can understand; it is easy to get stuck on autopilot in life, to sail through without ever really taking a look at what we're doing or where we're going. But the simple and often devastating fact is that what we're doing is going to take us somewhere -- and it may not be where we want to go. I also understand it because, frankly, triage is hard. It's hard to try to take a more objective stance on our lives. It's a lot of work, and requires a lot of thought. Sometimes I wonder if people think they are saving themselves trouble by coasting, by just dancing through life. It may work for awhile, but it seems to me that at some point, the gig will be up and we will have to start making decisions. (Sidenote: maybe this is the real curse of work; the fact that entropy exists and we can't just "be." Hm; something to ponder another day.) The reality I live in says that gardens need tending, cars need maintenance, flowers need to be watered, and people need to be loved; it's almost like the universe is built with a incessant obligation for interaction. There's an intrinsic cause and effect relationship built into the fabric of reality, and like it or not, I think that means us, too. I think that we must broaden our personal skill base in order to include the art of triage. Prioritizing is one of the essential functions we perform as humans, because it the sister of "choice." We cannot make decisions without prioritizing them, but that is exactly what many of us try to do. We have become chronic avoiders, letting life slap us in the face as we walk through. We think that we are somehow saving ourselves trouble by evading personal triage, but in fact, we are killing ourselves. The truth is that for the good of our humanity we must learn the art of triage, or we will never be fully human. //

Just Can’t Wait To Be Cool

Tonight Allison, I, and Housemate Kris watched a brilliant movie from the good 'ol days (read: 1998) that you may have heard of entitled Can't Hardly Wait. In case you live under a rock or were born after 1990, this was one of many late-nineties movies where the nerdy, yet heartfelt, love-struck white dude gets to finally make out with the super hot girl in the last scene. Another one of my favorites would come out a year later: She's All That, where they switch it around and the girl is the dork, but other than that it's pretty much the same movie. And I still love it. There's a classic scene in the middle of Can't Hardly Wait when William (another, more different nerd) performs Paradise City. Behold: The brilliance of this scene is, of course, that William goes from outcast to extreme super-lovin' stud in the time-span of a Guns 'N' Roses song. Housemate Kris says he calls this the Beck Principle -- if you do anything long enough and with enough gusto (e.g. dance like a fool to a song by a hair band, and/or, be Beck), eventually it, and you, will become "cool." In this method, "coolness" has more to do with simple longevity and stamina than it does with actually being cool. This actually works pretty well for me, because I've never known what the hell "cool" was anyway (and if you had a picture of me from '98, you'd know that's true). So I suppose I'll just keep doing what I do. So thank you Beck. And William. Rock on my friends -- rock on. And Ethan Embry, you kiss that girl. //

Strategist, Catalyst, Philosopher

(DISCLAIMER: There's a whole lot of StrengthsFinder lingo in this post; if you're finding yourself a bit confused, you probably should go check it out!) J. R. R. Tolkien once remarked, "Not all who wander are lost." I imagine many of us are wandering, searching, looking for something. And if you are anything like me, one of the things you want most to find is yourself. To a large degree, I think I've always been on a search, a hunt. I've been looking for what it is that I am "supposed" to do with my life; who I am "supposed" to be. Being the Self-Assured person I am, I've always thought that I had things -- including myself -- pretty well figured out. Well, I'm gradually coming to terms with the fact that that I don't really know much of anything. But I'm OK in the knowledge of that, at least. Here in California I have learned more about myself than I ever even dreamed possible. I attribute a great deal of that insight to the StrengthsFinder, but as with most things, you get out of it what you put into it. And, honestly, I have thought about it a LOT (some may call it obsession, but, whatever). Despite everything I've learned, though, I'm still not sure how to answer those first questions: "What am I supposed to do?" and "Who am I supposed to be?" (for me they're very much the same question). Because of my Competition, Maximizer, and Significance themes, I want to be The Expert in something so badly, I can almost taste it. And truthfully, I want to be the absolute best there is in the entire world. Now, maybe I'm off base here, but that seems to make things a bit tougher. How do you figure out what you're better at than anyone else out of roughly six billion other folks? But I'm trying to walk down this path. I stumble a lot, trip over my thoughts, and occasionally take wrong turns, but hopefully, If one were to look from a satellite vantage point or something, maybe they'd see that I'm at least heading in the right general direction...? It also doesn't help that I'm reading this book, trying to get my head around what it means to be a writer, and the author continually reinforces the fact that in order for people to care about what you say, you have to become an expert in that field. Makes sense. So I'm laying in bed this morning and these thoughts wake me from my slumber: what am I good at? I mean, really good at? I came up with a few things that I think are true. I'm really good at being a strategist. I can look at the variables of almost any given situation and weigh them fairly to determine the best possible outcome. I am good at making clarity out of chaos. I am also good at "connecting dots," at synthesizing information. I am also very good at being a catalyst -- a firestarter, if you will. After the smoke clears, I often seem to be the one left holding the lighter, and, to be honest, I kind of relish that responsibility. I love to start dialogues, to influence people, change minds, elucidate concepts. Which brings me to my last realization. I am a philosopher, but not in the sense that we typically think of philosophy these days. I heard once that the study of philosophy should have never become a collegiate major, or area of study unto itself, and I think I agree. For me the concept of true philosophy is actually about that notion of synthesis, of connection. Philosophy is about learning how to connect everything else; as an end to itself it quickly becomes fairly narcissistic, nihilistic drivel. But real philosophy, as I see it, is about Connectedness. And that, I am good at. So, what to do, what to do... Anyone else notice that epiphanies usually just lead to more questions? //